thanks for your insights i have taken notes On 3/22/06, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cosmin Bucur wrote: > > Leonardo , I guess you bring up some very valid points , that are > > irrelevant in my scenario ,. The applications i am trying to build > > are ment to replace desktop apps , that don't have the users used to > > bookmarking or pressing the back button . For my purpose bookmarking > > and the back button should not be allowed , all we care is that the > > application will work out of the box on any computer without needing > > an install or any system update . > > > This is rather an endless debate. For example, typical newbie question: > "if back / forward buttons are not supported, then why are they there?". > > Sometimes, disabling these buttons shows laziness. I know that's not > your case (don't get offended), but many times the buttons are disabled > because the programmer can't think of a way to make them work reliably. > For a typical non-ajax webapp is as simple as using Redirect-After-Post > and tokens. > > As an example, I have a bank account that can be accessed online, but > the web-interface has so many limitations, it feels very awkward. I'd > rather use my web browser like it was designed to be used. > Remember, in software, all of those requirements that would never show > up, will! One day, a customer will ask for a bookmark on his complex > query he just did. Or he will say "why can't I go back to the previous > page? It had important data I don't know how to extract again!". > > > Ideally I'd like to see both aproaches supported , allthogh I'd like > > to know if what I am going for seems stupid and unreasonable , or not > > worth supporting . > > > As a matter of fact, your request applies the same for single and > multiple pages application. Our discussion is just for fun, because it's > using nested components is needed for both. > > > As for the demo app yea ... programers are needed , and nothing i can > > say there since i've been promissing to help more for months and > > months yet theese days if i can get one hour of coding on my own stuff > > , away from the time I waste on redundant biz processes , I consider > > myself happy at the end of the day . > > > Your app is a large test area for Tacos, and the test cases are the way > to reproduce the bugs you find in your app. At least it is going to be > that way until we have a more stable framework (though you have to > acknowledge Tacos is much more stable now that it is in beta). > > Trust me, doing the small page test cases (using Selenium and the > examples in the demo) is *very* helpful. And it just takes a couple of > minutes ;). > > -- > Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi > DTQ Software > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Tacos-devel mailing list > Tacos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tacos-devel >
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Tacos-devel mailing list Tacos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tacos-devel
