On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: > > Anthony <o...@inbox.org> writes: > >> Still, there are times when it's tempting to add some sort of [sic] >> tag, to say "I know it's weird, but this is correct". > > Agreed, but perhaps these should all be > > lint:noname=yes > > so that it's obvious that the entire point is a hint to checkers, just > like markign up source code for lint or static analysis.
Is lint:noname a tag which is already in use? If not, something like lint:name=nocheck would probably be more easily extensible. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
