Anthony <o...@inbox.org> writes: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: >> >> Anthony <o...@inbox.org> writes: >> >>> Still, there are times when it's tempting to add some sort of [sic] >>> tag, to say "I know it's weird, but this is correct". >> >> Agreed, but perhaps these should all be >> >> lint:noname=yes >> >> so that it's obvious that the entire point is a hint to checkers, just >> like markign up source code for lint or static analysis. > > Is lint:noname a tag which is already in use? If not, something like > lint:name=nocheck would probably be more easily extensible.
No, I made it up. Your idea is much better.
pgp7oBMdgxu0b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
