Steve Bennett wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Richard Welty <[email protected]> wrote: >> i think anthony's proposal >> >> access=no >> police=yes >> <foo>=yes >> ... >> >> is sensible. > > Sure. OTOH, why bother? Can you picture a use case where it matters > whether police=yes is set? There are essentially two categories of > roads: > 1) Roads you can drive on > 2) Roads you can't drive on, but someone else can. > > In the case of 2, is there a benefit to describing *who* can? All > emergency services will drive wherever physically possible. But maybe > I'm oversimplifying or overgeneralising.
emergency=* tags already exist for emergency services, and I can think of at least one location in Oregon where a route is open only to emergency services and no others (oddly enough, it's also a rare instance where Americans drive left of the median). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
