On 1/11/10 9:11 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: > The only question I have about this stuff is whether "access=no" has > any use to mean "you physically cannot get past here". If so, then > it's worth having a tag like "access=emergency_services" to indicate > that it's physically traversable, but no members of the public are > allowed to use it. Which actually sounds an awful lot like > "access=private". emergency_services would be too strict a term, unless you can categorize speed traps and construction vehicles under the term (i wouldn't.)
i think anthony's proposal access=no police=yes <foo>=yes ... is sensible. richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
