My view was that baby=yes was shorthand for minage=0, maxage=about 4 - more a recommendation of age appropriateness than a hard limit. Also it was intended for the equipment rather than the whole play area - though in the unlikely case of an entire play area being for babies there wouldn't be any reason not to apply it to the whole area. Swings are the most common case, though there are baby slides and roundabouts near us as well.
I suppose what makes it for babies is that there is some postural support, or some form of restraint for small children who don't have the sense not to stand up and wander off while they are (say) at the highest point on a swing! The age is inexact, which makes it hard to specify. Or the equipment is very small, such that a fall from the top of it wouldn't damage a very young child. minage and maxage are in fairly common usage which is why I put them on the proposal - to cover the cases where the operators of the play area give a specific age/height range. Antony. On 14 May 2010 20:10, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15 May 2010 04:37, Erik Johansson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sure, I only want to use baby=yes to tag if there is toys for babies. >> This is mostly used for swings so I'm not entirely sure it's needed. >> :-) > > There could be an exclusive area for toddlers, another for children > and so on, imho instead of saying babies, put age in years, eg 0-0.5 > or 0.5 to 2 or 2 to 7 etc... > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
