On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 23:12:05 -0700, Simon Biber wrote: > Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> The way I've been handling this is to stretch the limits of the >>bicycle=destination tag; if it's more major than residential, open to >>bicycles, but lacks shoulders and has narrow lanes or on-street >>parking, then I tag it bicycle=destination (unless it qualifies for >>cycleway=lane). > > The tag access=destination is supposed to indicate roads where > transiting through is officially discouraged or prohibited, for example > with signs such as "local traffic only". > > I would use bicycle=destination only if bicycles were officially > discouraged from using the road as a thoroughfare.
Thanks for stating the obvious. Given that in Multnomah and Washington Counties in Oregon, bicycle lanes are required to be installed on all roads more major than residential where there's physical space, the only ways left that don't fit this category are officially discouraged on the official cyclemaps. This is at least the second time in as many months I've had to remind you to NOT vandalise the map. Please heed the advice. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
