On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: >> Any arguments against cycleway=sharrow? > > Yes, a cycleway should be mainly/exclusively for bicycles.
Hmm, I guess we're interpreting "cycleway=x" differently. You: "This is a cycleway, mainly/exclusively for bicycles. More specifically, it is a cycleway of type x." Me: "Regardless of what this is, as far as cycleways go, it has an 'x' kind of cycleway." That is, just as you can have "cycleway=track" (100% dedicated cycleway) and "cycleway=no" (0% dedicated cycleway), I think you can have all the points in the middle. A sharrow is not "a cycleway", but might be 20% a cycleway, so "cycleway=sharrow" is a good way of tagging it, IMHO. Anyone agree? Steve _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
