> Any arguments against cycleway=sharrow? > That is, just as you can have "cycleway=track" (100% dedicated > cycleway) and "cycleway=no" (0% dedicated cycleway), I think you can > have all the points in the middle. A sharrow is not "a cycleway", but > might be 20% a cycleway, so "cycleway=sharrow" is a good way of > tagging it, IMHO. > > Anyone agree?
I agree. The "highway" tag always designates the primary usage. For a way that is exclusively for bicycles, you should use "highway=cycleway". There is no point in having a "cycleway=x" tag unless it can be used in addition to other tags, such as "highway". So cycleway=sharrow makes sense. - Alan _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
