On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:26 AM, David Paleino <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:19:49 +0200, David Paleino wrote: >>> >>>> However, I'm using that because I consider "Foo Avenue" as a logical unit, >>>> a >>>> "route", even if the way is split (because of oneways, different >>>> classifications, different tags, whatever). >>> >>> See, for example: >>> >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/143031 >>> >>> That's a street with different classifications, a oneway-segment, and a >>> dual-carriageway one. >> >> No, I know what you're grouping. It's the why that I'm unsure about. >> Where's the benefit in this relation? > > You can link to it (like he just did). And you can more easily > add/remove/change tags which apply to the street as a whole.
Oh yeah, also you can have ways which are part of more than one street. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
