If, however, a parking lot were to be restricted for car-pooling use only, it would be reasonable to tag it as access=carpool or access=carpooling.
-------Original Email------- Subject :Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool From :mailto:[email protected] Date :Sun Nov 14 08:35:02 America/Chicago 2010 Le 14/11/2010 12:15, Nathan Edgars II a écrit : > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2010/11/13 John Smith <[email protected]>: >>> On 13 November 2010 21:38, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> access no is completely wrong IMHO, better might be access=private, >>>> which also might be wrong, as the access might be allowed, but not to >>>> park there. >>> >>> access=destination ? >> >> My point was that access is about the accessibility while here it >> might be needed a tag to indicate who is allowed to park. > > We use access=private for private parking lots, do we not? No parking where you can do carpooling are not private, you can park without doing carpooling too. Regards -- Rodolphe Quiédeville - Artisan Logiciel Libre Travailleur indépendant spécialisé en logiciel libre http://rodolphe.quiedeville.org/ SIP/XMPP : [email protected] _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
