2010/12/17 Pieren <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Simone Saviolo <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> We proposed the use of "landuse" because it really seems that simple: >> "what is the land used for?" "to deposit things, such as vehicles or >> goods, and, in general, to take care of them". In this sense, it may >> even include storage buildings - there's no need for a depot to be an >> open-roofed parking lot. >> > > If you look the history of "landuse", it was never so small (excepted for > cemetery and now garages sadly). For me, such depots are usually inside a > landuse=industrial/commercial area. What you create is a new definition of > landuse where we will have many overlapping polygones tagged as such.
I disagree. Should there be an industrial allotment with a depot next to it, the two should be drawn separately. You don't do *industry* in a depot, you just deposit things. In the same way, you don't do *transport* in a depot. Of course, if you're drawing landuses that cover tenths of sq. kms, you're probably willing to ignore a mapping so detailed to describe depots. > Pieren Simone _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
