2010/12/17 Pieren <[email protected]>:
> Yes and it would fine if we could continue in that way. Since landuses > shouldn't overlap where do you get this from? IMHO this is not defined in the wiki and looking at current "landuse values" like military or forest, sometimes they will have to overlap. To be clear: I wouldn't mind defining that landuses should not overlap, but IMHO this will result in changes to the current tagging scheme. > With this logic, we could > also tag schools, hospitals, parks, etc with landuse where today we don't > care about the surrounding landuse when we map them. yes, this is indeed another open question. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
