As someone who works in the industry could I just point a couple of things out.
generator:source=nuclear implies fission. There are no fusion generators anywhere in the world. There are experimental fusion reactors dotted around but none of them generate electricity, let alone generate anything for the grid. Listing the type of reactor (PWR for example) seems like a reasonable idea but we shouldn't get into tagging safety features such as core catcher. There is a virtually endless list of safety/security technologies used on these plants and OSM isn't the place to list them. If you wanted to collate this information there should be a separate database. On 27 March 2011 11:33, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/3/27 Pierre-Alain Dorange <[email protected]>: > > Following recent international events, i start study nuclear site on > > OSM. > > > > Nuclear power plant seems presents and use > > power=generator > > power_source=nuclear > > power_rating=2000 MW > > but according to wiki, this was obsolete and needs : > > power=generator > > generator:source=nuclear > > generator:methode=fusion (fission) > > generator:output:electricity=2000 MW > > > > good you mention this. I also thought we might extend this, e.g. tag > security features (core_catcher), and technical types (pressurized > water reactor, boiling water reactor, Pressurized Heavy Water reactor, > Reaktor Bolshoy Moschnosti Kanalniy (High Power Channel Reactor) , Gas > cooled reactor, ...) > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactor_technology > > You don't have to be a physical engineer in nuclear power technology > to tag these types, as the information is generally available. > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
