2011/3/27 Gleb Smirnoff <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:01:28PM +0100, Andrew Ainsworth wrote: > A> Listing the type of reactor (PWR for example) seems like a reasonable idea > A> but we shouldn't get into tagging safety features such as core catcher. > A> There is a virtually endless list of safety/security technologies used on > A> these plants and OSM isn't the place to list them. If you wanted to collate > A> this information there should be a separate database. > > We are making map, not encyclopedia.
no, we are creating a geo database. > So we should provide only name of a > power plant, and a link to wikipedia article, where any additional info > can be found, if user of the map is interested in it. "the map" might be the standard mapnik map, but also a specialized power map, which could be interested in more information then just "nuclear fission". I don't see why we have to rely only on wikipedia (it is of course good to have this link), if people are interested in tagging other detail, its welcome. > That would be: ... > wikipedia:en=the_foo_nuclear_power_plant usually wikipedia=en:foo is suggested. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
