On 3 May 2011 02:02, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > To reduce the danger of edit wars: what about _not_ defining the > events explicitly "significant" (most of German Wikipedia disputes are > about "relevance criteria" and I'd rather avoid similar discussions in > OSM if possible). Of course we all expect only "significant" events to > be mapped, but requiring it explicitly will encourage others to delete > stuff and say: but it was not significant (enough).
historic=battlefield is being lumped in with this vote as both are non-physical in the long term and so some people think both shouldn't be in OSM. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
