OK, I will do that! I think site relation is not a good example for a relation, because I'd add the tag to a member of the relation, but it's applicable for a building with a yard mapped with a multipolygon relation.
Zsolt Herrbert74 On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, fly <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 11.07.2011 16:00, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan: > > Hi! > > > > I changed the status of this proposal to Proposed only today, although > > the RFC was sent in February. Is it OK to start the voting in a few days > > (hours)? > > Luckily the history of the proposal wasn't inactive, I received some > > comments on the Discussion Page. I answered them there and modified the > > proposal a little bit. Anyone with better english skills than me is > > welcome to clean up the page. > > If I don't receive any more comments, I send out a Request for Voting. > > Please, have a statement that stamping_point=yes can be used with other > tourism=* as long as the location is not known better. > > Relations (like site) should also be valid case. > > At least with pilgim stamp points are often located in > tourism=attraction tagged building/sites. > > Thanks > fly > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
