Am 11.07.2011 22:27, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan: > I amended the page, but meanwhile someone made an interesting comment, > that we shouldn't use this on a building, because there is no building > built for that. I answered the following: > > "Interesting point. I think the tag is not describing the building as a > whole, but only a feature. Also I don't like to tag nodes that are part > of a(n) way/area. And where do you put the node with the tag if the > stamp is inside the building, e.g. in a pub under the counter? Putting > it on the entrance would be misleading, because it implies that the > stamp is on the wall, so you can use it outside opening hours. On the > other hand how can I render the stamp if the house already have another > icon? Would tagging a node solve this problem? I think the render would > not look nice. Herrbert74"
If you tag it as node at the real position (e.g within a building first level, 30 of the stairs on the left), it is OK. But at least a level=* and a description=* would be appropriate. > What is your opinion? > Does anyone know, how this would be rendered (in my own rendering for > hikers) if the building has already say, an amenity=pub tag (and I > already render pubs with icons)? What would be the best solution? It is the renderes choice which icon to render maybe it has an own extra icon but I would not count on it. cu fly P.S.: Your are right about site relations. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
