I moved the proposal to an obsolete status and started a new proposal. I don't want to change the body of the old proposal, because I think it can mess things up during voting. I know voting doesn't mean much, but it's better to have a consensus than not.
Zsolt Herrbert74 On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Pieren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Chris Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There is no real process. The idea of proposing tags so they get voted on >> is really broken. Tags can (and should) be used without a voting process. >> Documenting ideas and tags that get uses is a great idea. Discussing how >> tags might be used is also useful, but the idea that there is a formal >> process to get a tag approved is wrong. >> >> > It's not mandatory but if you follow the guidelines, your proposal is > discussed and improved until it is reaching a certain level of consensus and > documentation. Which is far better than just using some encrypted tags as a > trial on a few places. > > Pieren > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
