On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Zsolt Bertalan <[email protected]> wrote: > I moved the proposal to an obsolete status and started a new proposal. I > don't want to change the body of the old proposal, because I think it can > mess things up during voting. I know voting doesn't mean much, but it's > better to have a consensus than not.
Definitely. I think the voting process actually serves a purpose in attracting attention to a proposal, and building some consensus. And that means it can turn up issues you hadn't anticipated, like in this case. So let's consider the voting process a voluntary mechanism for increasing confidence in the soundness of a particular tagging proposal. Steve _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
