2012/1/11 Michael Krämer <[email protected]> > To be honest I haven't really thought about the > difference between until this thread came up...
That's a problem for various non-native speakers (me included eheh) This should be an opportunity to make some changes in syntax and semantics [1] of OSM. We should start a wiki entry to organize the ideas in a collaborative Project (The Plan?) which will become the reccomendation from the final approval on and a suggestion to migrate existing data :) (the automation should be leaved to whom messes with [local] data) My proposal: -main page: description, aim, index and discussion for general ideas; -subpages: one for each category or area of interest (primary features [2] gives a good approximation of what I mean) Also, this will promote also thinking on how would be simplified tagging particular features (comes in mind also the cultural/heritage theme, from archaeology to museums, a main key culture=*?). Discussion should be focused also on the best word to use, as John pointed out, and here the main work should be made by native speakers :) Stefano [1]http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Semantics [2]http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
