2012/1/11 Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> > parking=* requires amenity=parking. > > That seems entirely redundant to me, and if I were king, I'd strip out > amenity=parking. > (the whole parking scheme needs re-design to integrate the various > schemes currently in place). > > - Serge
This should be part of rethinking highway=* and all the features related to "automotive" for istance (roads, parkings, excetera). I find also bad the service=* tag.. 2012/1/11 Erik Johansson <[email protected]> > > > Use the tags, document them, link, upload pictures and write on the > wiki. Try not to plan. these are things you can do even though you are > not a native speaker. Openstreetmap has nothing to do with England nor > English. > > For tagging this is a X type of feature what we really need is lots of > info on "you want to add X to the map, then you can tag it like this, > that, or like this". Where the simplest answer is the default. > > But just look at the discussion for amenity=gym, simple things are the > hardest. > > When I said planning I meant to take existing keys and values, consider use cases and "plan" solutions :) Example: in a subpage there should be tables which explain what new tag inherit old one and why (back to the dentist: healthcare=dentist | amenity=dentist | seperating tagging for health ) > > migrate existing data :) > > Nice smiley.. :-) It's not about migrating data it's about migrating > stubborn fools. (i.e. everyone but yourself) You mean I'm like Don Quixote fighting with windmills? eheh
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
