Hi, On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Jo <[email protected]> wrote: > For what it's worth. When I start rendering/printing maps based on OSM, I > think it's extremely ugly if the landuse is not 'connected' to the roads, > i.e. that the landuse uses separate parallel ways with a small space in > between for its definition.
What looks ugly should not define how we map stuff. That's been said so many times I'm not sure I should even mention it again. If the looks are not to your liking, apply a different style sheet or fix it in your rendering process. Sharing nodes between roads and landuse (or any) polygons makes mapping more confusing and thus harder, so I would recommend against doing that. I do a lot of 'ungluing' landuse from ways where I live for that reason - and also because many of the landuse polygons were created by a non-agreer who, in the process, tainted a lot of ways. -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
