On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 22:23 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 1/21/2012 9:42 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 20:56 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > >> On 1/21/2012 8:50 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >>> On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 13:39 -0600, Toby Murray wrote: > >>>> Unfortunately I don't have a good picture of this myself so here is a > >>>> kind of crappy streetview shot: http://kan.st/yG > >>>> > >>>> The sign carries the name of this area. It is sitting in the middle of > >>>> a short section of split carriageway residential road indicating that > >>>> "you are now entering the Sharingbrook neighborhood. I would say that > >>>> includes the road. > >>> > >>> That would be boundary=administrative. > >> > >> So much for your "ground truth", eh? > > > > Are there examples of places where neighborhoods aren't administrative > > units of larger cities? > > Pretty much everywhere. Geographic administrative units are typically > larger than single neighborhoods, especially suburban neighborhoods such > as Sharingbrook. (It's not clear that Manhattan, KS has any such units; > its commissioners are elected at-large.) Are there examples of places > where there is a one-to-one mapping between neighborhoods and > administrative units?
Portland, Oregon has fixed districts. So does New York City (though it calls them boroughs).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
