On Feb 26, 2012 7:42 PM, "Frederik Ramm" <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > On 02/25/12 01:23, Richard Welty wrote: >> >> how do you tag a never-completed railway which has significant important >> landmark value in the current landscape? > > > I think that what you are seeing is not a railway at all. > > I suggest to tag what you see on the ground, rather than whatever the object was that people once planned to build. I don't see why there should be a "railway=cut" when a layman would never know the the cut he observes was once meant to have a railway line. >
So many counter examples to this line of thinking: highway = proposed, admin boundaries, under ground culverts etc. Steve
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
