Hi, On 03/05/12 12:16, Steve Bennett wrote:
It sounds like you want to create an extremely literal map devoid of any information that is not literally "on the ground".
Nah, it was rather about what the priority is. A constrution site could always be annotated with "this is planned to become a hotel", even though it isn't a hotel; and a cut could always be annotated with "this was once planned to become a railway" even though it isn't one.
I just found the idea of saying "this is a railway - a never-built one, but a railway nonetheless" a little extravagant.
Which of these actually appears on a map is, of course, a wholly different question.
Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
