For me, it looks like a bicycle-lane. On first look with no sign, so i
would tag it cycleway=lane + bicycle=yes (<- no designated or official,
because a OSM-cycleway is for me a way, that is "made for cycling" (with
no implied access), access can be added with bicycle=*).
But on second look [1], you can see a bicycle symbol, so it is:
cycleway=lane + bicycle=designated
[1]
http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=30.605287,-86.950497&spn=0.00253,0.002972&t=k&z=20
Masi
Am 18.04.2012, 05:47 Uhr, schrieb Steve Bennett <[email protected]>:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]>
wrote:
One regional mapper uses cycleway=shoulder for this, but I see that as
sub-optimal, since it's primarily a shoulder, not a cycleway. It would
be
like putting cycleway=sidewalk whenever there's a smooth paved sidewalk.
I quite like "cycleway=shoulder". It describes exactly what's going
on: the cycling infrastructure at this point isn't a marked lane
(cycleway=lane), nor a segregated lane (cycleway=track), it's a sealed
road shoulder.
Could you elaborate on your objections?
The real complication arises when there are shoulders of varying
quality that are assessed (by cyclists) as being more or less suitable
for cycling - leading to issues of subjectivity. At least the
situation you describe appears objective: the surface was intended for
cycling on.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
