2012/4/19 Pieren <[email protected]>: >> * PSV lanes SHOULD be included (also [2]). Example: lanes=3 and >> lanes:psv=1 means we have three lanes and one OF THEM is for PSV only. > Don't forget other reserved lanes like taxi lanes...
Thanks - I won't. >> * Parking lanes/spaces should NOT be included (see [4]). > What about stop lanes for bus stations ? (usually a short distance > extra lane used for loading/unloading passagers) ? My feeling tells me, not to count them. They are in my opinion not really traffic lanes, as they are intended only for stopping (maybe similar to parking lanes). >> * Turn lanes SHOULD be included (see [2] and [5]). > Not sure if it is a good idea. I can't see any reason, why they should be included. There were good reasons in the linked discussion to add them. >> * The lane count should change, as soon as a) new lane has reached its >> full width or b) a lane starts to disappear (usually a merge with >> another lane) (also [5]). > And what about the space between e.g. lanes=2 and lanes=3 ? I would suggest to continue with the previous lane count, until a new lane count is valid. Values like lanes=2.5 are not "that" intuitive, renderers could approximate the layout well enough and routers don't really care about half lanes, as they couldn't use them anyway. >> - A one-way road has one lane > excepted for motorways and trunk ? >> - Two-way roads have two lanes, one in each direction > also for highway=track/service ? After some additional thinking I notice that those assumptions are a bad idea: they would be too much exceptions. This would mean, that the assumptions currently present on the german page should be removed. Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
