Am 21.04.2012 um 14:23 schrieb "Ilpo Järvinen" <[email protected]>:
>> I would recommend lanes=2 and width=xxx. Maybe give some examples for >> the widths of some common, "narrow" roads? Can someone provide photos >> and widths? > > !?! ...No! Unfortunately this was exactly what I oppose! Sorry, I misunderstood you there. Let us start again: can we at least agree, that it is the correct solution to use width=xxx, but it is difficult to obtain a correct value? If so, how about recommending to use lanes=2 and est_width=4? Or maybe width=4 and source:width=estimated, because application support for est_width is even worse than for width? Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
