On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 14:08 +0200, Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote: > Am 21.04.2012 um 13:34 schrieb "Ilpo Järvinen" <[email protected]>: > > > ...What I don't really care if it is called lanes=1.5 or > > lanes=1/2+some_other_agreed_tag_which_is_not_an_estimated_width=x, but > > simply saying that use lanes=1/2 alone instead I oppose. > > I would recommend lanes=2 and width=xxx. Maybe give some examples for the > widths of some common, "narrow" roads? Can someone provide photos and widths?
The distinction used by OS is width is more than 4m or less than 4m. Phil _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
