Am 31.07.2012 22:50, schrieb LM_1:
Not knowing how different routers use access I believe that ways
marked as access=customers should be routed with some sort of warning.
The same goes for access=private. Quite commonly the real final
destination would be in some limited access area and so routers do not
have to absolutely avoid more restrictive access values than public.
Quite commonly the ferry would not be the real final destination - but
in the middle of the route.
Routers commonly do not use more restrictive access values in the middle
of a route ...
access=customer may be also parking places with bothside access.
access=private may be also big company areas with bothside access.
Commonly routers shall not use those - so why should they use them at
ferry terminals?
You may have to pay a "fee" to access, but I would call this a public
traffic route.
In particular if there is no other possible route.
As long as there is no other easy way I would "tag for routers" in this
case.
Georg
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
