> Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 12 > To: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:27:33 +0100 Hi, Im reading this as a cartonist. IMHO > is additional info harmfull for a map and the vieuw of it. Always keep in > mind that the added info has to be maintained. But why do we want to tag so > much info at a relation scheme, whos using it ? Like Martin stated > the more > dynamic the information is, the less we want it directly in OSM.The travel > time of a large or long distance ferry depends fi on the fees in the > harbours, theyre able to gain time by speeding up or loosing time by > travelling at economical speed. Even when a ferry crossing, a river from A, > B, C, D, is able to make a stopover on the trip D to A, when someone wants to > go along from C to A, its a seasonal ferry but nevertheless, no reliable > scheme ? Like Phil stated>With the advantige that the passenger gets more > time to sleep or to spend more money on the vessel. So its not a reliable > scheme. And how to tag two ferries meeting in between islands to allow > passengers to dismount from one ship to another ?Greetz Hendrik > > End of Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 12 > ***************************************
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
