Pls change the Subject of your replies when replying to a digest. _At least_ have the topic in the body text... But there's no reason not to have the subject of the email, well, in the Subject line.
With kind regards, -J -- Sent from my mobile device. Excuse my brevity and/or typos. SMS/call to +509-37269154 will usually reach me faster than email. On Sep 8, 2012 9:32 AM, "St Niklaas" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 12 > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:27:33 +0100 > > Hi, Im reading this as a cartonist. IMHO is additional info harmfull for a > map and the vieuw of it. Always keep in mind that the added info has to be > maintained. But why do we want to tag so much info at a relation scheme, > whos using it ? > > Like Martin stated > > the more dynamic the information is, the less we want it directly in OSM. > The travel time of a large or long distance ferry depends fi on the fees > in the harbours, theyre able to gain time by speeding up or loosing time by > travelling at economical speed. Even when a ferry crossing, a river from A, > B, C, D, is able to make a stopover on the trip D to A, when someone wants > to go along from C to A, its a seasonal ferry but nevertheless, no reliable > scheme ? > > Like Phil stated > >With the advantige that the passenger gets more time to sleep or to spend > more money on the vessel. > So its not a reliable scheme. And how to tag two ferries meeting in > between islands to allow passengers to dismount from one ship to another ? > Greetz Hendrik > > > > End of Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 12 > > *************************************** > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
