2012/10/16 Paul Johnson <[email protected]>

> I'd go with option b.  Despite being a single way, you're committed to
> taking the ramp by that point (due to the double-white solid lines), making
> it functionally an extension of the ramp.


The OP explicitly asks you to focus on section 5 alone, NOT on section 5 as
the introduction to section 6.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to