I would opt for (b) even though I know that this is not the "offcial" way of tagging. The reason: In section (4) the driver can still change lanes, at least on the middle lanes, whereas in section (5) he cannot (legally) change lanes any more between the middle lanes. This example clearly illustrates the - known - limitations of the presently used tagging scheme.
Volker On 15 October 2012 10:56, Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > Some kind of short how-would-you-tag-this-survey. Have a look at part > five of this motorway: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Lanes_Example_2.png > > Only part 5 is relevant. Assume there is no physical separation just a > double line between the upper and lower two lanes. How would you tag > this: > a) One way with lanes=4 > b) Two separate ways with lanes=2 each > c) Tell me! > > Please also reason your decision. > > Many thanks in advance, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
