I'd probably go for highway=service+surface=asphalt to photo 4, then highway=footway+surface=asphalt+bicycle=yes thereafter. Possibly highway=service all the way until it's not passable by motor-vehicle.
(residential seems inappropriate since it's a shared surface without even a token sidewalk, but it's tarmac not paving, so not highway=pedestrian) Richard On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Eric SIBERT <[email protected]>wrote: > Road classification... such a difficult subject in many countries. > > For the part that inhabitants can use, highway=residential and > access=destination. > > After, for me, the road is large enough for a car but motor vehicles are > prohibited -> highway = pedestrian. Don't care about park maintenance. > > until picture 9. > > At this point, a car can't use it. > > highway=footway : a intentionally organized way for pedestrians. (opposite > to highway=path for way that appears after repeated use by pedestrians but > not intentionally made for). > > In booth cases (pedestrian and footway), bicycle status is not clear by > default. Clear indication is welcome : bicycle = yes (assuming that the way > is mostly designed for pedestrian). > > Photo11 : I never now if it is mostly designed for bicycle > (highway=cycleway) or for pedestrians (highway=footway). > > segregated=no to indicate mixing of both type of users. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/**wiki/Key:segregated<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated> > > Eric > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/tagging<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
