On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Markus Lindholm <[email protected]> wrote: > My main argument is that I see addresses as a separate map feature in > their own right. An further more as there can be a M-N relationship between > addresses and POIs I think it's a bad idea to overload them on a single > element.
+1 For me, it was also obvious that the address is its own feature and not an attribute to e,g, a shop. Shops can change quickly. Addresses are more stable. You may also have shops in ground floor and private flats/appartments in upper floors. I don't see why the building address for those individuals should be identified by the shop attributes in ground floor. I don't think we need a relation if the link is defined spatially by the building area. Of course, they are simple cases where the building is one single address for only one single building (a shop or a residence building) in which case we can merge all attributes into a single node or closed way. Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
