2012/12/5 Markus Lindholm <[email protected]>: >> 2012/12/5 Markus Lindholm <[email protected]>: >> > I just pointed out two practical problems with overloading addresses >> > upon POIs. My main argument is that I see addresses as a separate map >> > feature >> > in their own right. >> +1, I agree with that, but isn't the logical consequence to tag them >> on polygons and not on nodes? > I don't see that. Polygons are more laborious to create than a node and > don't provide for a M-N relationships between addresses and POIs.
So your conclusion is to map addresses as nodes because it is less work than a polygon (of which you might already have a preliminary version: the building outline), and than you suggest to create relations between this address-node and every POI with this address? cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
