Hi Janko. Earlier this month, I asked to french list why only lines are mapped instead of circuits.
The answer was "Mapping cricuits by two parallels ways more of the time is useless and not efficient. We'd better mapping lines". Furthermore, we have relations to document circuits through power grid and this answer was really the good one. It's consistent to do the same for cables vs lines. All topics on wiki deals with reification of lines, not for cables. I think consistency is more important than all particular situations we can find. You find a deal for the renderer. But as a raw data consumer, It will be mandatory for me to find all the combinations to describe a line. It's not simpler. 2013/1/16 Janko Mihelić <[email protected]> > I think that if we map underground cables with "power=line, > location=underground" we will expect too much from renderers that don't > want to think too much about this. If you put "power=cable" they will not > render it, and everything is ok. > > There are three cables in the air as well. I'm sure we will find an > example of a powerline drawn with 3 lines :) And I'm not sure if I could > defend deleting those two. They "are" there. > > Janko Mihelić > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
