Yes maybee, but I dont really see any need for a relation (but I don't oposse it).
2013/1/25 Paul Johnson <[email protected]>: > This sounds like a job for a relation type=site > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Tobias Johansson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> I have an issue that may already have been discussed but I can't >> remember that I have ever seen it. That is the duplication of poi-data >> for certain features. There are two features I'm aware of that often >> are duplicated. One is the aeroway=aerodrome and the other is >> leisure=golf_course . In both of these cases the centerpoint of a >> polygon-poi could be considerd "incorrect" for the placement of a >> renderd label, therefore It's seems rather common to add a node with >> same (not always the same name..) tags on the main terminal building >> or the clubhouse for the respective poi's. I also konw that I read a >> long time ago somewhere on the wiki that this was not only common but >> correct for aerodromes (could not find it now..)? >> I find this practice wrong because it's unneccesary duplication of >> data. If you want to render a map with labels that way why not render >> the name from the aeroway=aerodrome where the one of the >> aeroway=terminal is? Maybee we could use a building=clubhouse tag for >> golfcourses (and other places with clubhouses aswell ofcourse ;) )? >> >> Best Regards Tobias >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
