Since these are the names of the houses/estates, what'd be wrong with using addr:housename?
- Svavar Kjarrval On 26/03/13 13:13, Pieren wrote: > Dear the list, > > In France, we have some private housing estates where the streets are > not named and the adresses are the housing estate name itself. For > instance, the housing estate is called "Lotissement Les Jardins de > Tisca". The streets inside the etate are private access and are not > officially named. I guess something we can find in many countries. > > One of our contributor wants to keep the streets unnamed and put on > houses addresses the following tags : "addr:housenumber" with the > house number and "addr:street" with the housing estate name. And draw > a surrounding polygon for the whole housing estate with > "name=Lotissement Les Jardins de Tisca" and "landuse=residential". > > Is this tagging correct ? Can we leave the streets unnamed or with the > tag "noname=yes" ? Some QA tools or validators complain about a > missing street for the "addr:street=Lotissement Les Jardins de Tisca". > Just ignore the warnings ? Or should we consider another "addr" tag > instead of "addr:street" like "addr:block" or "addr:place", > "addr:neighbourhood", "addr:estate" ? Is the housing estate correctly > tagged with "landuse=residential" + "name" ? What is your current > practice locally ? > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
