2013/3/26 Pieren <[email protected]>: > In France, we have some private housing estates where the streets are > not named and the adresses are the housing estate name itself. For > instance, the housing estate is called "Lotissement Les Jardins de > Tisca". The streets inside the etate are private access and are not > officially named. I guess something we can find in many countries.
so far I have only encountered private streets which did have official names or none at all, and I am not sure if I would set an unofficial name to a street, but maybe I would, given that it might be better to have any name than none (if there is a commonly used "unofficial" name, if not, obviously keep the street name blank). > One of our contributor wants to keep the streets unnamed and put on > houses addresses the following tags : "addr:housenumber" with the > house number and "addr:street" with the housing estate name. And draw > a surrounding polygon for the whole housing estate with > "name=Lotissement Les Jardins de Tisca" and "landuse=residential". > > Is this tagging correct ? Can we leave the streets unnamed or with the > tag "noname=yes" ? Some QA tools or validators complain about a > missing street for the "addr:street=Lotissement Les Jardins de Tisca". > Just ignore the warnings ? Or should we consider another "addr" tag > instead of "addr:street" like "addr:block" or "addr:place", > "addr:neighbourhood", "addr:estate" ? Is the housing estate correctly > tagged with "landuse=residential" + "name" ? What is your current > practice locally ? There is also the tag "addr:full" usable for all kinds of addresses that don't fit well with the standard scheme. I wouldn't use "addr:housename" when it is more than one house (i.e. if it's the name of the estate with several houses). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
