Am 09.10.2013 09:40, schrieb Georg Feddern: > Am 08.10.2013 20:16, schrieb Volker Schmidt: >> >> >> >> >> >> Just for your reference - while for many cases, I agree that >> bicycle=no >> is appropriate, there are quite interesting cycleways in the Czech >> Republic, where using bicycle=dismount for nodes on a path would >> make things easier for people editing OSM. Consider this: >> http://img.ct24.cz/cache/900x700/article/20/1936/193540.jpg >> http://img.ct24.cz/multimedia/videos/image/646/medium/193542.jpg >> (and don't ask me what idiot proposed a cycleway like this). >> >> >> This is the standard way of doing things here in Italy as well. At >> every "end of cycleway" sign you are legally supposed to dismount and >> cross the lateral road as pedestrian > > well, as it is also signed as the end of the legal footway/sidewalk - in > my opinion it is no need for a _dismount_ there. > In my opinion it is just a legal backdoor, that on these driveways (or > serviceways?) you leave the legal cycleway/footway (with the regarding > legal rights above the otherwise crossing traffic) and have to obey the > crossing traffic for your own risk - even as walker, but also as cyclist.
+1 highway=crossing crossing=unmarked sloped_curb=both would be appropriate. cu fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
