Hi! 2013/10/17 Ronnie Soak <[email protected]>
> So my questions: > - Are these schemes both still actively used? Are there data consumers who > use these already? > I don't know about turnlanes, but all the :lanes-keys I watch are continuously growing in usage numbers. > - What are the pros and cons of using them both in parallel? > The turnlanes concept is too limited, in my opinion, as it concentrates only on junctions. We need information about lane connectivity also elsewhere, e.g. on motorways if lanes are split. I strongly recommend a common and generic scheme for lane connectivity. > - Are there better ways of getting *all* of the information across without > the redundancy introduced by using both schemes? > I think the time has come to dig up the old lane connectivity ideas [1]. I'm definitively not a friend of relations, but in this case I'm afraid there's no reliable and robust solution without them. Should I revive the lane connectivity and put it into a new proposal so we can collect thoughts there? br, Martin [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/lanes_General_Extension/ProposalPreVoting#Lane_connectivity
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
