+1 fly. Issue 230 isn't asking support modification for existing features. It only ask for the support of a new one.
ITO world add this support in less than 2 hours after the proposal acceptance. Just my 2 cents. *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com 2013/11/3 fly <[email protected]> > Am 03.11.2013 15:11, schrieb Matthijs Melissen: > > On 3 November 2013 13:48, François Lacombe > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I actually sent this mail because the main mapnik map won't be updated > until > >> the number of occurences of sub_station become low in tag-info. > > > > This is exactly one of the problems I was addressing in the discussion > > 'How to overcome lack of consensus'. > > > > Mapnik won't be updated until the usage has changed, and the usage > > won't changed until Mapnik has been updated. Therefore, it is > > effectively impossible to change tags. I see that as a major problem. > > What is the problem about supporting both tags for now ? > > Why is carto not supporting accepted tags ? > > The power proposal changes are a real success as they show that > discussion and voting can lead to something. > > fly > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
