2013/11/9 Ole Nielsen <[email protected]> > +1 > We should surely not make an automatic conversion of the tag. Keeping the > old tag is useful for tracking substations that need reviewing. > +1
> I asked this question in another thread and got one suggestion: > "local_distribution". I have since tagged a few substations with > "minor_substation" as 'local' is a somewhat ambiguous term (I admit that > could also apply to 'minor) but I haven't documented anything so far. > Did you use power=minor_substation or substation=minor_substation ? Taginfo dosen't know both of them. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/power=minor_substation http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/substation=minor_substation IMHO, using power=minor_substation isn't a good way regarding the rest of substation refinement proposal. We'd better make the distinguish with substation=* (and may we use substation=minor_distribution ?) to avoid any semantic and custom thresholds problem in the future (like it was for station/sub_station and like it's still for line/minor_line). > For substations that are not for 'special purpose' (such as converter, > traction etc) the recommendation is to use the value 'transmission' for > substations having a highest operation voltage above 100 kV and > 'distribution' for those below that voltage. There may be reasons to > deviate from this rule but the average mapper having no special knowledge > about a particular substation should stick to this rule. > +1 to make it "default". To definitely move on this voltage problem too. Specific situations for each countries could be detailed in the country power project page. *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
