It has occured to me that this seems to be more of something simliar to tourism=theme_park, yet smaller. I don't know if there is such a tag that is widespread or if it's better to use your own tag.
I think it's not such a good idea to use leisure=playground + fee=yes, since it most certainly is not a playground, but sure playgrounds really do span a very big range from a sandbox to extremely large contraptions . I have now tagged two soft play centes with leisure=play_land which is a direct translation from Swedish. Feel free to adopt or change my tags. It would be interesting to tag "place where kids can play", many museums/science centers have that as well. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:30 PM, nounours <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dom, > > I don't know about voting ... > > But I read your interesting proposal. > I completely agree that indoor-playgrounds should be mapped. > > In Switzerland, it seems that they are normally mapped as leisure=playground > and indoor=yes, see example: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1687169329 > > I personally think that keeping things together is better, so why not stay > with playground? There are managed playgrounds, and there are indoor_play > which are free. There are outdoor playgrounds with opening-hours .... > > > So, why not use: > > Leisure=playground > Indoor=yes|no > Fee=yes|no > Managed=yes|no > Opening-hours=* > Operatortype=public|private > Operator=* > > etc. > > Maybe a template would help more than a new tag? > > Greetings, nounours > > > > Am 04.11.2013 um 14:07 schrieb Dominic Hosler: > >> Hi everyone, >> It has been almost two weeks and the discussion seems to have died down. >> How long should it be left, before initiating a vote, and how long >> should a vote last on the proposal? >> This is the relevant wiki page: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Indoor_play >> Thanks, >> Dom >> >> On 24 October 2013 14:23, Jonathan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> That's definitely better but I would make the description more generic, such >>> as "An indoor area for children to play" and then make the padded aspects, >>> cafe etc sub tags that can be added. The indoor_play tag should be able to >>> be used by those in other countries who have similar facilities but minus >>> the padding or cafe. The tage of indoor_play needs to be the umbrella tag. >>> >>> Jonathan >>> >>> http://bigfatfrog67.me >>> >>> >>> On 24/10/2013 12:13, Dominic Hosler wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks, I feel a bit silly now, I didn't look hard enough. >>>> New page is at: >>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Indoor_play >>>> for anyone wanting another look. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dom >>>> >>>> >>>> On 24 October 2013 12:04, Matthijs Melissen <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Use the arrow down button on the upper right (next to the Search box) >>>>> and choose 'Move'. >>>>> >>>>> -- Matthijs >>>>> >>>>> On 24 October 2013 12:59, Dominic Hosler <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have updated the page to indoor play, but I don't know how to >>>>>> actually change the title of the page? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do I need to just delete that one and create a new proposal called >>>>>> Indoor play? >>>>>> Putting a note in the discussion that it has been migrated from the >>>>>> previous soft play proposal? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Dom >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23 October 2013 20:51, Dominic Hosler <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree we should move away from the trademarked title 'soft_play'. >>>>>>> Perhaps >>>>>>> if we keep the proposal and change the name of the tag to indoor_play, >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> include other types as well, as per brad's suggestion. We should also >>>>>>> include sub tag qualifiers to specify if it's soft play and for what >>>>>>> ages >>>>>>> it's designed. I think it would be most appropriate to use indoor play >>>>>>> considering its catch all nature and the fact that it is already used >>>>>>> by a >>>>>>> couple of websites. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will update the proposal and fill in the definition area, I must have >>>>>>> just >>>>>>> missed it. However, I won't update it till tomorrow because I only have >>>>>>> my >>>>>>> phone until then. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Dom >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree, we need to choose a term that is more generic, maybe >>>>>>>> leisure=childrens_adventure or kids_play or kids_amusement. There can >>>>>>>> always be a sub tag defining soft_play? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Especially considering that a lot of softplay areas are now included >>>>>>>> among >>>>>>>> other internal children's play features? Softplay is just one bit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://bigfatfrog67.me >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 23/10/2013 17:47, Brad Neuhauser wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Instead of "soft play", what about "indoor play" (or indoor play >>>>>>>> area/centre)? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1) it seems to be used as a catch all sometimes, even in the UK (ie - >>>>>>>> http://www.timeout.com/london/events/indoor-play-centres-in-london or >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.dayoutwiththekids.co.uk/things-to-do-family/Northampton/Indoor-Play-Areas) >>>>>>>> 2) it is broad enough to cover all of these sort of places, since some >>>>>>>> indoor play areas may only have some actual "soft play" equipment >>>>>>>> meant for >>>>>>>> younger kids/toddlers (or, if you are only meaning the actual areas >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> have the soft play equipment, then that might be different) >>>>>>>> 3) it might make more sense for those outside the UK who don't use the >>>>>>>> term "soft play" much >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Brad >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Dominic Hosler >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Due to child protection, you are generally not allowed to take >>>>>>>>> pictures inside the soft-play centres. Also, any official pictures >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> copyrighted. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In the proposal, I linked to a few websites of some soft play >>>>>>>>> centres, >>>>>>>>> where they have pictures, I hoped this would be fine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Soft play is as Jonathan said, padding not inflatables. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Dom >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 23 October 2013 14:31, Jonathan Bennett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 23/10/2013 14:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Would they qualify as soft play? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, that's a bouncy castle. Soft play is padding, not inflatables. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- /emj _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
