I like that idea Martin, I've added a link to the playground tag for tagging individual pieces of equipment (if anyone feels the need to).
Should I just start the voting by putting today's date, or do you think it should be left for more comments first? Thanks, Dom On 5 November 2013 14:57, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2013/11/5 Erik Johansson <erjo...@gmail.com> >> >> I think it's not such a good idea to use leisure=playground + fee=yes, >> since it most certainly is not a playground, but sure playgrounds >> really do span a very big range from a sandbox to extremely large >> contraptions . > > > > +1, I think his current proposal leisure=indoor_play is fine, I'd encourage > mappers to add explicitly "fee"=yes/no/amount because otherwise (if fee is > implied) we would have to invent another tag for those places that are > non-commercial or offer this kind of service as included in the general > entrance fee to a bigger place. > > > >> It would be interesting to tag "place where kids can play", many >> museums/science centers have that as well. > > > > IMHO the same tag could be used. > > I'd also add a link from the current proposal to this page: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground because the tagging of > the equipment could be the same than for leisure=playground where possible. > > CHeers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
