Hi! 2013/11/28 Egil Hjelmeland <pri...@egil-hjelmeland.no>
> I still do not think man_made=surveillance is perfect. But I do not have > huge problems with it as long as it is documented. > If something is properly documented in OSM it is a near to perfection as it will ever get ;-) I also think that surveillance does make sense in this context. > But if I kindly refer you to > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance , you will > see that it talk about Big Brother, not about webcams. It does not even > define how to link to a image on internet. Have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:Surveillance man_made=surveillance surveillance=webcam contact:webcam=<url> Seems fine to me. > So when only a few hundred webcams displaying landscape are mapped in the > world, I would say there is a real problem that people do not know how to > map them. > Or that not a lot are interested in tagging them. Everyone has different interests - I don't think I would ever map a webcam. But I do map fire hydrants... sometimes ;-) Best regards, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
