If that's the case, then "bicycle:(forward|backward)=no" would also be broken, which I'm not seeing in the proposal. As Mele can vouch for, I'm probably OSM's strongest bicycling advocate, and I can't see a strong use for adding another tag to a key on this one.
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Jonathan <[email protected]> wrote: > You mean the cycle lane is only oneway and so bicycle=no on the road stops > bikes both way? > > http://bigfatfrog67.me > > > On 01/12/2013 00:15, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote: > >> >> Am 30.11.2013 um 21:25 schrieb Matthijs Melissen < >> [email protected]>: >> >> Cyclists shall be required to use the track if the track is running >>> along a >>> carriageway, footpath or track for riders on horseback and leading into >>> the >>> same direction >>> >> >> Again a confirmation ("and leading into the same direction") that >> bicycle=no on the road doesn't work (like many opposers stated in the >> voting) >> >> Cheers, >> Martin >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
